Search Results for: "dupixent"

FDA Accepts Regeneron and Sanofi’s DUPIXENT (Dupilumab) sBLA for Priority Review

Last week, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Sanofi announced that the FDA has accepted a Priority Review of the supplemental Biologics License Application (sBLA) for DUPIXENT (dupilumab) 300 mg weekly to treat patients aged 12 years and older with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).  EoE is a chronic, immune-mediated, atopic inflammatory condition of…

Read More

PTAB Issues Final Written Decision Finding Immunex’s Patent at Issue in Dupixent® Litigation Unpatentable

Yesterday, the PTAB issued final written decisions in two IPR proceedings (IPR2017-01884 and IPR2017-01879) it instituted on February 15, 2018 against U.S. Patent No. 8,679,487 (the ’487 patent), held by Immunex.  The ’487 patent is directed to isolated human antibodies that compete with a reference antibody for binding to human interleukin-4 (IL-4) receptor. …

Read More

Biologic and Biosimilar Litigation Updates

Below we provide updates in three pending litigations. First, in an update on the Amgen v. Coherus appeal regarding Coherus’s biosimilar application for pegfilgrastim, Amgen filed its opening brief on August 20. Amgen’s statement of the issues reads: 1. Whether the district court erred in dismissing Amgen’s Complaint, with prejudice, based…

Read More

Litigation Update:  Sanofi’s Summary Judgment Motion Denied, Immunex Renews Its Motion to Stay Pending IPR in DUPIXENT Patent Litigation

Following up on our previous coverage of Immunex’s patent infringement suit against Sanofi related to Immunex’s Dupixent® (dupilumab) biologic, Judge Otero recently denied Sanofi’s motion for summary judgement of invalidity based on indefiniteness of the claim terms “competes” and “binding affinity (Ka).” Sanofi criticized Immunex’s ’487 patent for failing to…

Read More

Litigation Updates on Pegfilgrastim and Dupilumab

Pegfilgrastim litigation  We had previously covered Judge Stark’s grant of Coherus’s motion to dismiss Amgen’s complaint alleging infringement of the ‘707 patent in Amgen v. Coherus. Today, Judge Stark entered judgment against Amgen and dismissed the case. In the Amgen v. Mylan litigation earlier covered here, Mylan recently filed a…

Read More

Immunex Files Reply In Support of Motion To Stay Dupixent® Patent Litigation

In the ongoing Immunex v. Sanofi patent litigation regarding Immunex’s claims of infringement against Sanofi and Regeneron’s Dupixent® (dupilumab) product, Immunex has filed a reply brief in support of its motion to stay the litigation pending Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 8,679,487 (“the ‘487 patent”), which Sanofi has opposed. Sanofi filed three IPR petitions on…

Read More

12