Tagged as: Immunex

Litigation Updates on Pegfilgrastim and Dupilumab

Pegfilgrastim litigation  We had previously covered Judge Stark’s grant of Coherus’s motion to dismiss Amgen’s complaint alleging infringement of the ‘707 patent in Amgen v. Coherus. Today, Judge Stark entered judgment against Amgen and dismissed the case. In the Amgen v. Mylan litigation earlier covered here, Mylan recently filed a…

Read More

Immunex Files Reply In Support of Motion To Stay Dupixent® Patent Litigation

In the ongoing Immunex v. Sanofi patent litigation regarding Immunex’s claims of infringement against Sanofi and Regeneron’s Dupixent® (dupilumab) product, Immunex has filed a reply brief in support of its motion to stay the litigation pending Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 8,679,487 (“the ‘487 patent”), which Sanofi has opposed. Sanofi filed three IPR petitions on…

Read More

Immunex Moves To Stay Dupixent® Patent Litigation Pending IPR

Last week, in the ongoing Immunex v. Sanofi patent litigation regarding Immunex’s claims of infringement against Sanofi and Regeneron’s Dupixent® (dupilumab) product, Immunex moved to stay the litigation pending resolution of two IPR proceedings the PTAB instituted on February 15, 2018 (IPR2017-01879 and IPR2017-01884) regarding the sole asserted patent: U.S. Patent No. 8,679,487….

Read More

Sanofi/Regeneron Move for Summary Judgment of Invalidity in Dupixent® Patent Litigation

Last week, in the ongoing Immunex v. Sanofi patent litigation regarding Immunex’s claims of infringement against Sanofi and Regeneron’s Dupixent® (dupilumab) product, the Defendants moved for summary judgment of invalidity of the sole patent-in-suit, the ‘487 patent, on the ground that the patent’s claims are indefinite. According to Defendants’ brief,…

Read More