On February 21, 2019, Sandoz initiated a lawsuit against Amgen in the Northern District of California seeking a declaration that its biosimilar filgrastim and pegfilgrastim products do not infringe the Amgen’s ’997 patent. The ’997 patent relates to a method of protein purification and is in the same patent family…
Last October, we reported that Taiwan-based Tanvex BioPharma (“Tanvex”) announced that it had submitted a BLA to the FDA seeking approval of TX-01, a proposed biosimilar referencing Neupogen® (filgrastim) indicated for chemotherapy induced neutropenia. Last November, the FDA accepted Tanvex’s BLA for its filgrastim biosimilar. This week Tanvex has submitted a New Drug Submission (NDS) to…
As we previously reported, the district court granted Sandoz’s motion for summary judgment of non-infringement in the ongoing Amgen v. Sandoz litigation, which relates to Sandoz’s filgrastim and pegfilgrastim biosimilars. Amgen filed its opening Federal Circuit appeal brief in May, arguing that the district court made several errors in its…
Stay tuned for an in depth analysis of the arguments.
The parties in Amgen v. Sandoz (N.D. Cal.) (filgrastim and pegfilgrastim) have submitted a joint case management statement regarding the two pending cases between the parties: Case No. 3:14-cv-04741-RS (accused product: Zarxio® (filgrsatim-sndz), which Sandoz launched in September, 2015) and Case No. 3:16-cv-02581-RS (accused product: pegfilgrastim (biosimilar to Amgen’s Neulasta®). The parties…