Tagged as: Sarepta Therapeutics

REGENXBIO and Sarepta Agree to Stay Litigation Pending Outcome of Sarepta’s IPR Petition

As we previously reported, REGENXBIO Inc. and the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania filed suit in Delaware in June 2023 against Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc., Sarepta Therapeutics Three, LLC, and Catalent, Inc., alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 11,680,274 by Sarepta’s gene therapy product, ELEVIDYS (delandistrogene moxeparvovec-rokl).  On September 19,…

Read More

Year in Review: Top Legal Developments of 2023

As we settle into 2024, we reflect on the significant legal developments of 2023 that hold potential impact on the biologics and biosimilars market.  The following is a recap of some of the top five legal decisions and developments in the biosimilars and biologics space in 2023 that we covered…

Read More

District Court Grants Summary Judgment and Invalidates Patent in REGENXBIO v. Sarepta Litigation

On January 5, 2024, in litigation between REGENXBIO and Sarepta Therapeutics, Judge Richard Andrews of the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware District Court granted summary judgment for Sarepta and ruled that University of Pennsylvania’s (“Penn”) U.S. Patent No. 10,526,617 (the ’617 Patent; licensed to REGENXBIO) is invalid…

Read More

Scheduling Order Issued in REGENXBIO v. Sarepta Litigation

As we previously reported, REGENXBIO Inc. and the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania filed suit in Delaware in June 2023 against Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc., Sarepta Therapeutics Three, LLC, and Catalent, Inc., alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 11,680,274 by Sarepta’s gene therapy product, ELEVIDYS (delandistrogene moxeparvovec-rokl).  Sarepta and Catalent each…

Read More

Sarepta and Catalent File Answers in REGENXBIO v. Sarepta Litigation

As we previously reported, REGENXBIO Inc. and the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania filed suit in Delaware against Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc., Sarepta Therapeutics Three, LLC, and Catalent, Inc., alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 11,680,274 by Sarepta’s gene therapy product. Sarepta’s gene therapy product, SRP-9001, was approved this June…

Read More

Think You Don’t Need to Worry About Patents Before Commercializing Your Gene or Cell Therapy Product? Think Again! The Safe Harbor and Lessons Learned from REGENXBIO v. Sarepta.

Many pre-commercialization gene or cell therapy companies are aware of the patents that could threaten their product after launch, but assume that they are protected from patent infringement suits before they obtain FDA approval and sell their products under the so-called “safe harbor.” In this webinar on August 2, 2023,…

Read More

REGENXBIO Sues Sarepta Therapeutics for Patent Infringement on Gene Therapy Product

Last week REGENXBIO Inc. and the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania filed suit in Delaware against Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc., Sarepta Therapeutics Three, LLC, and Catalent, Inc., alleging that the defendants’ adeno-associated virus (“AAV”) technology gene therapy product has infringed or will infringe U.S. Patent No. 11,680,274 (“the ‘274 Patent”)….

Read More