Archives for 


Federal Circuit Oral Arguments in NYC today: A Review

Amgen v. Apotex (pegfilgrastim)  •  Biologics Litigation  •  BPCIA and Related U.S. Statutes  •  Janssen v. Celltrion (infliximab)  •  Patent Dance  •  U.S. Biosimilar Litigation News
As we noted earlier today, this week the Federal Circuit is holding oral argument at various venues in New York City. Two of today’s oral arguments were in biosimilar cases that we have been closely […]

View More

Year in Review: The Top-Five Legal Developments of 2016

Amgen v. Apotex (pegfilgrastim)  •  Amgen v. Sandoz (filgrastim)  •  Biosimilar News  •  BPCIA and Related U.S. Statutes  •  Patent Dance  •  PTAB + IPR  •  Reimbursement  •  U.S. Biosimilar Litigation News  •  U.S. Federal Circuit Decisions  •  U.S. Supreme Court Decisions
Here are our picks for the top-five most significant legal developments in the world of biosimilars in 2016: 5) Congress passed and President Obama signed the 21st Century Cures Act.  Among other things, […]

View More

Biosimilars Council Files Amicus Brief in support of Apotex’s Petition for Certiorari in Amgen v. Apotex

Amgen v. Apotex (pegfilgrastim)  •  Biosimilar News  •  BPCIA and Related U.S. Statutes  •  U.S. Biosimilar Litigation News  •  U.S. Federal Circuit Decisions
As we covered in a previous post, Apotex has filed a cert. petition asking the Supreme Court to review  the Federal Circuit’s ruling on the BPCIA’s notice provision in Amgen v. Apotex.  Last […]

View More

Breaking News: Apotex Does not Infringe Amgen’s Filgrastim and Pegfilgrastim Patent; Apotex is Permanently Enjoined From Launch Until It Provides 180 Days’ Notice

Amgen v. Apotex (pegfilgrastim)  •  Patent Dance  •  U.S. District Court Decisions
The District Court for the Southern District of Florida today ruled that Apotex’s proposed filgrastim and pegfilgrastim products will not infringe the asserted claims of Amgen’s ’138 patent (U.S. Patent. No. 8,952,138).  The court, […]

View More