Search Results for:

BREAKING NEWS—Amgen v. Sandoz: Amgen’s Emergency Motion for an Injunction Pending En Banc Consideration and Review

Following the parties’ petitions for rehearing en banc in Amgen v. Sandoz, Amgen has filed an emergency motion for an injunction to block the launch of Sandoz’s FDA-approved biosimilar filgrastim product, pending the Federal Circuit’s en banc consideration and review.  Sandoz is currently enjoined from marketing its biosimilar product, Zarxio,…

Read More

Update in Amgen v. Apotex: Scheduling Report

As we reported in an earlier post, Amgen v. Apotex is the first biosimilar litigation in which the parties have actually danced the entire “patent dance” through the “first wave.” The case, which concerns Apotex’s application to market a biosimilar version of Neulasta, has already been scheduled for trial beginning July…

Read More

IPR Tracker: IPR2015-01792 (Coalition for Affordable Drugs V LLC, et al.) (U.S. Patent No. 8,163,522)

  IPR2015-01792 (Coalition for Affordable Drugs V LLC, et al.) (U.S. Patent No. 8,163,522) Petitioners: Coalition for Affordable Drugs V LLC; Erich Spangenberg; Hayman Capital Management, LP; Hayman Captial Master Fund, LP; Hayman Credes Master Fund, LP; Hayman Investments, LLC; Hayman Offshore Management, Inc.; Hayman Orange Fund SPC – Portfolio…

Read More

IPR Tracker Updates: Rituxan (rituximab) IPRs

As we covered in an earlier post, the PTAB has instituted two IPR proceedings concerning patents related to Rituxan® (rituximab) (see IPR2015-00417 (U.S. Patent No. 7,976,838) and IPR 2015-00415 (U.S. Patent No. 7,820,161)). The PTAB had denied institution on a third rituximab IPR petition filed by Boehringer Ingelheim (see IPR2015-00418 (U.S. Patent No. 8,329,172))….

Read More