Last week, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Sanofi announced that the FDA has accepted a Priority Review of the supplemental Biologics License Application (sBLA) for DUPIXENT (dupilumab) 300 mg weekly to treat patients aged 12 years and older with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). EoE is a chronic, immune-mediated, atopic inflammatory condition of…
On March 15, 2022, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) denied institution of post-grant review (PGR) proceedings initiated by Celltrion Inc. concerning Regeneron Pharmaceutical’s U.S. Patent No. 10,857,231 (the ’231 Patent) after Regeneron disclaimed the patent. The ’231 patent has claims directed to formulations of aflibercept, the active ingredient…
On October 29, 2020, the European Patent Office ruled in favor of Sanofi and Regeneron in their dispute concerning Amgen’s Praluent® (alirocumab) patent. The EPO found invalid certain claims of Amgen’s European patent, EP 2 215 124, which is directed to PCSK9 antibodies. This EPO decision follows a ruling in…
On February 25, 2019, a jury in the District of Delaware made findings related to the validity of two of Amgen’s patents (U.S. Patent Nos. 8,829,165 and 8,859,741) covering its cholesterol-lowering drug Repatha® (evolocumab). The jury found Sanofi and Regeron failed to demonstrate that at least some claims of the…
On March 19, 2018, Novartis and Grifols sued Regeneron in the Southern District of New York, asserting that Regeneron’s manufacture of its EYLEA® and ZALTRAP® products infringes U.S. Patent No. 5,688,688. Previous cases in which Novartis asserted the ’688 patent against MedImmune, Biogen, and Alexion have all been concluded.
South Korea’s Alteogen announced that its aflibercept biosimilar ALT-L9 had demonstrated similarity to the originator with no significant side effects in Michigan-based non-clinical trials. Aflibercept, known commercially as Eylea®, is sold by Regeneron for the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration, which is the leading cause of blindness among the elderly….
On January 3, 2017 in the Amgen v. Sanofi/Regeneron action, Judge Robinson denied Defendants’ motion for judgment in their favor as a matter of law (JMOL) and request for a new trial regarding written description and enablement of the asserted claims of the patents-in-suit. On March 16, 2016, after a trial,…