On November 1, 2018, Genentech and its co-plaintiffs dismissed the lawsuits they brought against Celltrion and Teva under the BPCIA in the District of New Jersey, in which the plaintiffs alleged that Celltrion’s filing of an aBLA relating to Truxima®, Celltrion’s proposed biosimilar to Rituxan® (rituximab), infringed certain patents. The…
As reported here, the Oncologic Drug Advisory Committee (ODAC) held a public hearing today at the U.S. Food & Drug Administration to discuss and vote on Celltrion’s Biologics License Application for CT-P10, a proposed biosimilar of Genentech’s U.S.-licensed rituximab product Rituxan. The hearing included presentations from various speakers from industry,…
We have covered Pfizer’s development of biosimilars of Genentech’s Avastin® (bevacizumab) and Herceptin® (trastuzumab) and its related IPR filings IPR2016-01771 and IPR2016-01837. Following written decisions invalidating those two patents, Genentech appealed and challenged the constitutionality of subjecting patents that issued before the America Invents Act (AIA) was enacted in 2011…
Last week, Genentech Inc. filed a complaint against Eli Lilly and Company (Lilly) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 10,011,654 (’654 patent) based on Eli Lilly’s commercial manufacture, use, sale, offer for sale and/or importation of Taltz® (ixekizumab) in…
We previously reported that on December 21, 2017, Genentech filed suit against Sandoz in the District of New Jersey based on Sandoz’s proposed rituximab biosimilar, Rixathon/GP2013. On April 23, 2018, Judge Renee Marie Bumb held an in-person status conference and set forth a preliminary injunction briefing schedule. The Court ordered the motion for preliminary…
We previously reported that in the ongoing Genentech v. Amgen litigation regarding Amgen’s proposed bevacizumab biosimilar, Mvasi™, Amgen moved to dismiss Genentech’s declaratory judgement counts relating to when Amgen could begin commercial marketing of its product. In particular, Genentech had sought a judgment that Amgen could not market its product…
Genentech v. Pfizer (trastuzumab): On February 12, 2018, the parties filed a joint status report. Among other things, the parties offered their competing proposals for discovery deadlines. The parties stated that they have been “engaged in the exchanges of information provided under the” BPCIA and that Pfizer provided its notice of…
We previously reported on Genentech’s complaint in the District of Delaware alleging that Amgen’s MVASI™ (bevacizumab-awwb) infringes over twenty Genentech patents and Amgen’s motion to transfer that complaint to the Central District of California. Today Amgen filed its reply (redacted) in support of transfer. In its reply, Amgen addresses Genentech’s…
As we previously reported, on October 6, 2017, Amgen and Genentech filed separate lawsuits regarding Amgen’s bevacizumab biosimilar (MVASI®), with Amgen filing for declaratory judgment in C.D. Cal. of non-infringement, invalidity, and unenforceability of 27 patents, and Genentech filing a complaint for infringement of 24 patents in Delaware and a…
We previously reported that on September 12, 2017, the FDA accepted for review Sandoz’s aBLA for a proposed biosimilar of Rituxan® (rituximab), which is indicated for the treatment of certain blood cancers and immunological diseases. Yesterday, Genentech filed a complaint in the District of New Jersey based on Sandoz’s proposed rituximab biosimilar, Rixathon/GP2013. Genentech…