The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts has denied Celltrion’s motion to dismiss the action for lack of standing. As we previously reported, Celltrion argued that certain co-owners of the ’083 patent-in-suit were not parties to the action when Janssen filed its 2015 complaint, and that Janssen’s attempts to…
This week, six Federal Circuit panels will hear oral argument on at various venues in New York City. Two of today’s oral arguments are in biosimilar cases that we have been closely following on this blog. First, at 10:00 AM, a panel will hear oral argument at the U.S. Court…
With the pre-trial conference set to begin on February 6, 2017, the parties in Janssen v. Celltrion have filed several motions seeking to exclude or limit certain evidence and testimony that may be offered at trial. Expert Testimony Celltrion has filed a motion to exclude the opinions of Janssen’s proffered expert…
As we previously reported, on September 26, 2016, the district court in Janssen v. Celltrion entered partial final judgment that the ’471 patent, asserted by Janssen, was invalid. Today, Janssen filed a notice that they are appealing the district court’s judgment to the Federal Circuit. Meanwhile, Celltrion’s partner Pfizer announced last week that it will begin shipping…
A few BPCIA litigation updates to wrap up the week for our readers, looking ahead to next week: The Federal Circuit issued its formal mandate in Amgen v. Apotex yesterday. With the issuance of the formal mandate, the Federal Circuit has officially ordered that its July opinion in the case must now be…