Search Results for:

Australia Allows Substitution of Biosimilar for Etanercept Brand

Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) announced that Brenzys, an etanercept biosimilar, “could be marked as equivalent” to the branded antibody Enbrel on the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). Considering the clinical evidence presented, PBAC recommended that there was “comparative safety and effectiveness of Brenzys and Enbrel.” Therefore, by substituting…

Read More

What’s in a Name? a Quick Guide to Biologic Drug Names

We have previously reported on the complicated naming issues surrounding biosimilar products and how biological qualifiers, such as three or four-letter codes, should be added to distinguish between them. However, the naming of the original biologic drug product is well established, as outlined by the World Health Organization (WHO), and…

Read More

Update in Janssen v. Celltrion: Parties Stipulate that Celltrion Will Not Sell Remicade Biosimilar Before October 3, 2016

In a stipulation filed yesterday in Janssen v. Celltrion, Celltrion has agreed not to sell its Remicade biosimilar in the U.S. for use by doctors or patients before October 3, 2016, and the parties have agreed to dismiss all claims and defenses related to Defendants’ alleged violation of the BPCIA’s 180-day notice of commercial marketing provision (42…

Read More

Celltrion Begins Shipping Remsima to the U.S.

As we reported last week,  the district court granted Celltrion’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for one of the two patents-at-issue in Janssen v. Celltrion.  The Korea Times reports that Celltrion shipped its first batch of its Remicade biosimilar, Remsima, to the U.S. on August 19th, the day after the ruling. Please continue to…

Read More

BREAKING NEWS: Summary Judgment, Claim Construction, Consolidation, Bifurcation, and Trial Schedule Order Issued in Janssen v. Celltrion

Following three days of hearings in Janssen v. Celltrion, the District Court for the District of Massachusetts (J. Wolf) today issued a memorandum order summarizing the Court’s rulings on several pending motions in the case. The Court granted Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of the ’471 patent on both…

Read More