Archive for 2016

Litigation Update: Amgen v. Hospira (epoetin alfa)

A couple of updates on Amgen v. Hospira (epoetin alfa): Amgen has requested that the district court (D. Del., J. Andrews) grant it leave to file a second amended complaint “to add three additional defendants” who, Amgen alleges, “have directly or indirectly infringed Amgen’s patent-in-suit, United States Patent No. 5,756,349.” Meanwhile, Hospira…

Read More

TPP Updates: McConnell, No Congressional Approval This Year

Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said that the Senate will not vote on the TPP agreement this year, seemingly foreclosing the possibility of passage during President Obama’s tenure. Administration officials continue to push for the deal and hold out hope as Treasury Secretary Jack Lew noted in comments at the Brookings Institute. Meanwhile,…

Read More

Litigation Update: Motions in Janssen v. Celltrion for Entry of Final Judgment and Case Scheduling

  As we posted previously, the District Court in Janssen v. Celltrion has ruled that the ‘471 patent is invalid for obviousness-type double patenting on the two grounds raised in the defendants’ motions for summary judgment on that patent. The defendants last week moved for an entry of final judgment on the plaintiffs’ infringement allegations for the…

Read More

Australia Allows Substitution of Biosimilar for Etanercept Brand

Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) announced that Brenzys, an etanercept biosimilar, “could be marked as equivalent” to the branded antibody Enbrel on the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). Considering the clinical evidence presented, PBAC recommended that there was “comparative safety and effectiveness of Brenzys and Enbrel.” Therefore, by substituting…

Read More

What’s in a Name? a Quick Guide to Biologic Drug Names

We have previously reported on the complicated naming issues surrounding biosimilar products and how biological qualifiers, such as three or four-letter codes, should be added to distinguish between them. However, the naming of the original biologic drug product is well established, as outlined by the World Health Organization (WHO), and…

Read More

Update in Janssen v. Celltrion: Parties Stipulate that Celltrion Will Not Sell Remicade Biosimilar Before October 3, 2016

In a stipulation filed yesterday in Janssen v. Celltrion, Celltrion has agreed not to sell its Remicade biosimilar in the U.S. for use by doctors or patients before October 3, 2016, and the parties have agreed to dismiss all claims and defenses related to Defendants’ alleged violation of the BPCIA’s 180-day notice of commercial marketing provision (42…

Read More