Archives for 

Janssen v. Celltrion (infliximab)

BPCIA Litigation Roundup (Spring 2017)

AbbVie v. Amgen (adalimumab)  •  Amgen v. Apotex (pegfilgrastim)  •  Amgen v. Coherus (pegfilgrastim)  •  Amgen v. Hospira (epoetin alfa)  •  Amgen v. Sandoz (filgrastim)  •  Amgen v. Sandoz (pegfilgrastim)  •  Immunex v. Sandoz (etanercept)  •  Janssen v. Celltrion (infliximab)  •  Janssen v. Samsung Bioepis (infliximab)  •  U.S. Biosimilar Litigation News
Below is our spring update on the U.S. patent litigations concerning proposed or approved biosimilar products. For additional details, please consult our BPCIA Litigation Summary Chart or our previous quarterly updates (Summer 2016, […]

View More

CELLTRION FILES RESPONSE BRIEF IN INFLIXIMAB APPEAL

Biosimilar News  •  BPCIA and Related U.S. Statutes  •  Janssen v. Celltrion (infliximab)  •  Patent Dance  •  U.S. Biosimilar Litigation News  •  U.S. District Court Decisions
As we previously reported, in Janssen v. Celltrion, Janssen appealed the district court’s partial final judgment that Janssen’s ‘471 patent, relating to monoclonal antibodies including infliximab, is invalid. As we also previously reported, Janssen filed its opening appeal […]

View More

BPCIA Litigation Roundup (Midwinter 2017)

AbbVie v. Amgen (adalimumab)  •  Amgen v. Apotex (pegfilgrastim)  •  Amgen v. Hospira (epoetin alfa)  •  Amgen v. Sandoz (filgrastim)  •  Amgen v. Sandoz (pegfilgrastim)  •  Genentech v. Amgen (bevacizumab)  •  Immunex v. Sandoz (etanercept)  •  Janssen v. Celltrion (infliximab)  •  U.S. Biosimilar Litigation News
Below is our midwinter update on the U.S. patent litigations concerning proposed or approved biosimilar products. For additional details, please consult our BPCIA Litigation Summary Chart or our previous quarterly updates (Summer 2016, […]

View More